A Turkish model for Trump’s press policy

Some journalists celebrate Press Freedom Day in prisons, courtrooms and exile

Can Dündar

Can Dündar is the 2017 laureate of the Golden Pen of Freedom, the annual award of the World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers

Special to The Globe and Mail, Toronto

 

The police came in the early hours. Everyone was asleep. It was twilight. Thirteen journalists’ homes were raided in the early hours of Oct. 31. The editor-in-chief of the newspaper lived in one. The CEO in another. Columnists in four, lawyers in three. The reporter, the ombudsman, the books section editor, the cartoonist, the accountant… All were senior figures in the Cumhuriyet, Turkey’s oldest and most prestigious newspaper.

Trying to reassure their terrified, bleary-eyed children, they were forced to watch as their homes and archives were turned inside out and computers were impounded. They were taken to the main police station first, then to the hospital for a medical, and finally to the biggest prison in the country. Placed in solitary cells, with no idea what their crime was. As it turned out, they had to wait for 151 days before they could learn. The indictments were announced on the 151st day: Aiding and abetting armed terrorist organizations.

Which organizations, I hear you ask?

The very same PKK that the government had shared a peace table with three years previously, and the Gülenists that the government had jointly been ruling the country with for a decade.

Funnily enough, the risks posed by the Gülen movement had been flagged by these journalists, who were now accused of being Gülenists.

And the evidence, I hear you ask?

The reports, interviews, headlines, tweets and columns critical of the government. In other words, they would be tried on charges of journalism.

I, as the former editor-in-chief, was the number-one defendant. And I was charged with altering the newspaper’s editorial policy. My first reaction was to exclaim, “So what?” Since when did prosecutors determine editorial policy for newspapers, anyway?

The answer is obvious: Since the president’s seizure of the media in his drive for absolute power… Last year Erdoğan embarked upon a sweeping crackdown, accusing his former partner Gülen of masterminding the July 15 coup attempt. This was a God-sent opportunity to get rid of his opponents once and for all, even as he purged the civil service of the Gülenists he had personally installed. Having secured absolute power with a declaration of state of emergency on July 20, he then constitutionalized this de facto regime through a referendum held under “civil” martial-law conditions – an amendment rejected by half the nation, all the restrictions and controversial electoral commission practices notwithstanding.

Turkey had fended off the coup attempt on July 15, but fell victim to a counter coup of Erdoğan on July 20. Not a military rule, but a police state.

In the wake of the coup attempt, the number of journalists in prison quadrupled from 30; as the Cumhuriyet contingent joined the 120, Turkey became “the world’s biggest prison for journalists.” The constitutional amendment elevated Erdoğan to the position of one man; one man to rule the government, the parliament and the judiciary, in charge of the mechanism that appoints judges and prosecutors.

Not unsurprisingly, every journalist’s appeal for release was rejected. With a few exceptions, there was hardly any media left to criticize this turn of events: One jailed journalist is a hostage that silences several others outside. This was the method used to silence the Cumhuriyet, one of the last bastions of the free press.

Even the tea boy who runs the cafeteria was arrested; his crime being a gripe: “I wouldn’t serve Erdoğan tea if he came here!” overheard by the police constable on duty at the paper, who informed his superiors. Lo and behold, the next morning our tea boy was taken into custody on a charge of “insulting the President.”

The Cumhuriyet is scheduled to appear in court on July 24. The entire editorial team of a newspaper are scheduled to face a judge for the first time after 267 days. They will be defending not only themselves, but also the free press, as well as a democracy that is fighting for its life in the hands of a despot.

If this is a coincidence, it certainly is an ironic one.

July 24 is the anniversary of lifting of censorship in Turkey, commemorated since 1908 as Press Freedom Day. This year, we commemorate Press Freedom Day as “Struggle for Press Freedom Day” in prisons, courtrooms and exile.

All our colleagues are invited.

Note from starrindissent: Dundar and a fellow Cumhuriyet journalist were released on February 26, 2016, after the Supreme Court ruled that further detention was an “undue deprivation of liberty.” On May 26, 2016, during a break in Dundar’s trial, a man fired several shots at him outside the courthouse. He was unhurt but a nearby television journalist was hit in the leg. On the same day Dundar was sentenced to five years and 10 months in prison for “leaking secret information of the state,” but the court released him without travel restriction pending appeal. In June he moved to Germany, and on October 31 a Turkish court issued a warrant in absentia for his arrest.   

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s